upvote
It's not possible. But there are more and less neutral ones.
reply
I'm asking you out of pure curiosity, it's not an attack: what difference does it make to have a domain controlled by Google versus a more general one?
reply
If Google doesn't like you, it can remove your domain.

Also, many people (apparently not you) are uncomfortable giving money to Google.

Google also ends up with some limited information about who is accessing your website.

reply
I'm not very scared; there are no precedents for similar cases except for security problems or the dissolution of a country.

Update: I see you've edited the comment. Regarding paying Google, I have no problem paying for their services. I don't know what the issue is. By the way, the domain is managed by Squarespace.

reply
Google Registry / Charleston Road Registry Inc. operates the .dev TLD

What they sold to squarespace was Google Domains, the user facing registrar from which you can buy domains from most TLDs. It doesn't get any special treatment wrt to .dev

reply
Registrars, even when they "own" the TLD can't unilaterally remove you.
reply
No support
reply
Who is 'he'? Did you use an LLM for translation, and it used he instead of I?
reply
Human error, thanks for the heads-up!
reply
What does "neutral" mean? Which ones are more neutral ones? Any examples of issues with Google, or with the more neutral ones?
reply
Ultimately controlled by a country "more neutral" than the USA. Looks like .me is not neutral.
reply
As far as I understand, everything ends up centralized to USA anyway (ICANN), who then tells everyone what TLDs are allowed or not.
reply
If ICANN removed a country TLD it would be an international incident that would break the internet in two - USA and everyone else.
reply
It's possible, if you have $600,000 to purchase one.
reply
depending on the org, maybe closer to $100,000 https://www.dotfurry.org/#why-furry
reply