Hacker News
new
past
comments
ask
show
jobs
points
by
ddoolin
23 hours ago
|
comments
by
n4r9
23 hours ago
|
next
[-]
My reading is: "The agency would surely be panicking more than this if they didn't have an offline backup".
reply
by
rob74
22 hours ago
|
parent
|
[-]
"Offline backup", as in "thousands of shelves full of dusty binders spread across offices all over the country"?
reply
by
throw1234567891
22 hours ago
|
parent
|
[-]
Yup. Everyone’s job safe for the next few years!
reply
by
rob74
22 hours ago
|
parent
|
[-]
"And to think that we just finished digitizing all those paper files five years ago! Oh well, back to square one..."
reply
by
embedding-shape
23 hours ago
|
prev
|
next
[-]
I think the "offline" part is what is that "appears" to be, clearly they have backups somewhere, but maybe the attacker just missed to wipe some other "online" location.
reply
by
sixothree
21 hours ago
|
prev
|
[-]
I interpreted this as a vagueness related to the reporting accuracy, not the existence of a backup.
reply