Hacker News
new
past
comments
ask
show
jobs
points
by
SubiculumCode
2 hours ago
|
comments
by
bigfishrunning
2 hours ago
|
next
[-]
Generating a set of weights is not learning.
reply
by
jayGlow
16 minutes ago
|
parent
|
next
[-]
would you say that airplanes don't fly because they don't flap their wings? it's possible to achieve the same things with different approaches.
reply
by
SubiculumCode
1 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
[-]
That is a strong statement. I guess you are telling Machine Learning to go fuck itself.
reply
by
bigfishrunning
1 hours ago
|
parent
|
[-]
No, Machine Learning is an unfortunate name for a well documented process for creating black-box classifiers. The process is good, the name is not.
reply
by
SubiculumCode
36 minutes ago
|
parent
|
[-]
And what, to your mind, would classify something as learning? I assume that your position is not the hard "only humans/living creatures can learn"
reply
by
trollbridge
2 hours ago
|
prev
|
next
[-]
Great! Neither is distillation then.
reply
by
SubiculumCode
2 hours ago
|
parent
|
[-]
Never said it was. Still, understanding to what extent the ability of Chinese labs to keep up to western models with much less compute needs to be understood.
reply
by
Espressosaurus
2 hours ago
|
prev
|
[-]
Machines are not humans.
reply