> The United States government considers US supremacy in "AI" as a national security consideration.
replyAnd we foreigners consider US supremacy in AI to be an existential threat. Your "national security" is directly harmful to us. I never thought I'd say this but the chinese are starting to look like a beacon of hope for the rest of us.
If the Chinese look like a beacon of hope you then you really should be looking closer.
replyLook closer at what? USA consistently proves itself to be a terrible ally.
replySpeaking for you, or All of you? How?
replyAI companies do not get to play the "Making an LLM using our data is unethical because the resulting LLM will replace us and hurt our profits" card.
replyIt doesn’t matter. Distillation is impossible to stop. They could release an extension that intercepts requests and in return gives you a discount like Honey and get the same data.
reply> Distillation is impossible to stop
replyLots of things are impossible or very difficult to stop completely but measures can be taken to reduce their prevalence.
Sure, but the problem is that it hurts legit people too.
reply> the problem is that it hurts legit people too.
replyWhat hurts other people too?
Measures to stop "distillation", rate limiting, ID verification, etc. If there were such a method that didn't harm legitimate use it would already be in place (and some things are, but they don't really work, hence the OP).
replyNobody cares about "legit people", the only thing that matters is that people we don't like suffer.
replySad but true
replys/announcement/claim
replyYou don't get to call Moonshot's a "claim" and this political hack's an "announcement." They're the same thing. Treat them the same. Diction designed to favor one of two equal positions is some weak sauce.