Yes, this makes a lot of sense, but it’s just very amusing to see. 2 months ago, the world was about to end, now not so much.
reply7+ years ago GPT2 couldn’t be released because it was deemed too dangerous[0]. It was, of course, eventually released.
replyIt’s seven years already. Crazy.
replyI realized it a why back these labs are selling hype.
replysince then I have never cared about models except those that affect money in my pocket e.g AWS Nova Sonic
> now not so much
replyOpenAI Huggingface breach begs to differ
Have you been patching your systems for the past two months? It was crazy even if you completely forget the supply chain literal FUBARs and you must’ve been living under a rock to not see OpenAI (accidentally) pwning hugging face
replyDo you have an example of the "doomsday marketing" you're referring to?
reply- https://www.anthropic.com/research/glasswing-initial-update
reply- https://www.axios.com/2026/04/08/anthropic-mythos-model-ai-c...
- https://www.axios.com/2026/04/07/anthropic-mythos-preview-cy...
- https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-mythos-latest-ai-m...
- https://www.reuters.com/world/anthropic-ceo-dario-amodei-arr...
I see a pretty big gap between finding software vulnerabilities and “the world is about to end”. It is literally true that AI models are finding software vulnerabilities. It is also to my mind a reasonable thing that you’d want to be cautious about rolling out a model that can find more vulnerabilities. So what is the objection you have to these sources?
replyAbsolute masterpiece of a rebuttal. No notes.
replyfeels almost like anthropic is desperate for ipo huh
replyi think we'll see one of the fastest deflations in history post anthropic/oai ipo