upvote

points

by rienbdj9 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby Atotalnoob7 hours ago|
next
[-]
Yes, but it’s slower on non-bun runtimes. Nowadays, I believe they bundle bun with CC

They chose to use a react rendering to native TUI renderer, which was a source of a lot of performance issues.

AFAIK, they have written a new renderer.

reply
upvoteby solid_fuel38 minutes ago|
parent|
next
[-]
> They chose to use a react rendering to native TUI renderer, which was a source of a lot of performance issues.

The source of the performance issue here is their own incompetence, actually. I have never in my entire career heard of a rendering pipeline as idiotic as the custom one they built.

reply
upvoteby well_ackshually3 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
>AFAIK, they have written a new renderer.

Which is equally terrible and has earned them every single rendering engineer in the world taking the piss out of them when they proudly announced it was as complicated as rendering a video game.

reply
upvoteby bigstrat20035 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
> They chose to use a react rendering to native TUI renderer, which was a source of a lot of performance issues.

That's such a stupid engineering choice that it really makes one question if the people working at Anthropic have any software engineering ability at all. There's no excuse for running React in a freaking TUI.

reply
upvoteby jFriedensreich8 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
because their js code is so bad and slow that they need the bun performance hacks and optimisations.
reply
upvoteby jdiff7 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Do these hacks make bun less secure than other runtimes? I find it a little hard to believe you can get much more robust and performant than V8 or SpiderMonkey without cutting some corners that notably went uncut by either for all these years.
reply
upvoteby msdz7 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Bun uses JavaScriptCore, which is Safari’s JS engine, for the actual interpreter portion of its runtime.

Which makes the parent comment’s “Bun performance hacks and optimizations” sound a little far-fetched, at least in this scenario I don’t think that’s gonna be the deciding factor. Their vendored JSC is also not touched by this port-rewrite at all whatsoever (still Cpp), so I’m not sure if it’s even possible to hack-improve all that much there.

reply
upvoteby jFriedensreich6 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
yes, especially compared to deno bun does not have proper isolation or permissions at runtime layer which is why anthropic tries to fix the lack by a mixture of app layer (build into claude code) and os layer (srt) however using runtime permissions would allow much better security if done right.
reply