Thank you! Text is not the main part of this repo. The main part is the technology and the list of experiments (and some useful knowledge I got from this project, haha). I have always been bad at writing or editing text (in both my native language and English), but without text it is impossible to share this project online.

Text was the last and most difficult part for me. It is not perfect (and this project is not perfect as well), but I believe it does the job of communicating my ideas

I'm not making any moral judgements based on it, merely observing it.

The writing is made worse by a specific choice which the commentator identified. That’s actionable feedback.

Why would you want to signal low effort for your writing and the related project?

I am with you in principle.

There is 0 wrong with using AI to write a draft.

However catching the glaring LLMisms shows that the person did a pass and tried to edit the obvious LLMisms.

For me, unprocessed AI output is perfectly fine as the means to the end, but not as a final output.

> Is the article useless slop: fine, downvote it to oblivion.

You can’t downvote submissions on HN, only flag them. Identifying when text was written by LLMs is a useful signal. Maybe you don’t like these repeated comments, but I’d bet the people making them hate even more that they feel they wasted their time reading it.