I'd imagine those 300K years they're not just working 40 hours a week, more like 70+ hours. Add higher taxes on those years and it becomes less attractive.
replyOooof. I pity the poor fool who has to pay taxes on their 300k annual salary.
replydeleted
replyIf it was a predictable & reliable 300k, 30k, 300k, 30k, 300k, 30k pattern, then yes.
replyBut if not...
I imagine a Bernoulli pattern would work too
reply