Maybe I'm using too weak language in my prompts, but none of the OpenAI models I've used via codex has refused to reverse engineer binaries, is it supposed to? I'm sitting right now reverse-engineering a 3rd party firmware together with Codex and haven't hit a single guardrail. Meanwhile, I see people complaining about it rejecting non-security related prompts, are things so individual on the platforms right now or what's going on?
Thanks.
The idea was that I could continue to use the application in the future and export the new data, not that I would be able to recover the extent data already in there.
I use OpenCode mostly (uses fewer tokens than Claude Code) and I am looking forward to the release of DeepSeek’s own coding harness.
It's replaced the Kimi models for me though.
Availability and rate limiting can be an issue, though. I’ve found that constraining the providers works well to solve that though.