upvote
Solving math problems doesn’t require the cooperation of rival factions.
reply
It's a tad petty, no? In the end, the contribution to a healthier society leads to more for the companies contributing.
reply
Sure but the people who tend to get into leadership positions are people that are primarily concerned with personal wealth and gain in the short term. It's the prisoner dilemma except with more players that all assume everybody else is going to screw them over too. Because there are basically zero personal downsides to being the one to screw everyone else over.
reply
None of these problems need technology to solve. Step 1 is trying to get different groups of people to cooperate with each other. Good luck with that.
reply
Yes, but all of those are orders of magnitude harder than math.
reply
I suppose it depends on which types of problems you're targeting. There is a lot of physical science, and theoretical science, that has gaps because there aren't enough people working on tooling to assist in things like calculation, generation, simulation, etc.

I agree, some of the problems are more difficult. I don't think that's the case for all of them. And, besides, these companies could be demonstrating how to approach problems and where their users could spend tokens to help with these problems.

Should not these companies try to work on these problems _because_ they are difficult?

reply
They are political problems, a computer could never solve them.
reply
A computer could solve them by creating the right technological ,social, rhetorical and economical solutions but that would lots of money anyway
reply
We already know the solutions
reply
Tell that to game theory.
reply
What's stopping the non-profits that exist today from just putting more money into tokens to get the solutions they want?
reply
I'm not sure if this is meant to be rhetorical. If it isn't: money and manpower. The LLM companies have the money, they have the manpower, and so they could likely spare to target some of the problems they are also helping cause.
reply
Seriously?

We already know how to solve all of these issues. What we lack is collective political will.

reply
There is boundless technology we have not yet discovered. I think that we understand we have problems. I don't believe we actually know how to solve them all.

And yeah, the lack of collective political will sucks. It would be naïve, however, to think that there is no value in ensuring longevity in our current and future infrastructure. And improving it to sustain the population giving these companies their value is an obvious win.

reply
This SV mentality that technology can solve all problems is rather tiring, really.
reply
We only know how to do it by means of considerable sacrifice. That's why nobody wants to do it. Solving the issue would be doing it without sacrifice or somehow getting us to do it regardless.
reply
> We only know how to do it by means of considerable sacrifice

Little sacrifice actually

> Solving the issue would be doing it without sacrifice

So... you are expecting magic?

LLMs cannot create resources out of thin air.

reply
Almost like superintelligence solves these problems...
reply
We know how to solve food insecurity (in 1st world countries). We have plenty of food. Capitalism requires though throwing out food that can't be sold because billionaires find giving away things anathemic to their worldview. Get rid of billionaire sociopaths.
reply