upvote

points

by KronisLV3 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby jeffrwells2 hours ago|
next
[-]
According to ccusage I use about $5k of tokens on my $100/mo Claude Max plan and only hit 5-hr windows where I have to switch tools for a couple hours about once a week
reply
upvoteby epylar2 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
Subsidized Anthropic subscriptions seem to work fine on the oh-my-pi harness, somehow.
reply
upvoteby 3uler23 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
Calling per token usage of the US closed source labs has always been funny to me, we have a clear model of what it actually costs to host these models from open models.

Your subscription is not subsidised, it is just closer to the actual cost of the model…

reply
upvoteby epolanski2 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
It's so unfortunate people don't realize it's cheaper to write their own well working agent instead of insisting with general purpose bloated ones like Claude.

200$/month is a lot of money on Luna/DS4 flash, like really a lot and the results are much better than clowning on bloated CC.

It's absurd how you have more and more organizations encoding their processes on LLMs and "engineers" (charlatan coders) don't even bother optimizing the tool they use most.

reply
upvoteby RussianCow2 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
> the results are much better than clowning on bloated CC.

I won't argue with the cost effectiveness, but the results are very much not better. Opus and Fable are in a different league than DS4 Flash. Even GPT Terra, which I really like overall, sometimes gets stuck in weird loops and starts to do stupid stuff once its context window fills up. Whereas I can more or less trust the big models to just Do The Thing™ on the first try.

With that said, you get way more value out of a GPT subscription than you do from Claude, partly because of the ability to use more efficient harnesses.

reply