To "solve it" would require either a single counter example disproving the claim, or a proof that the conjecture about the Riemann zeta function is true.
replyIf OpenAI claimed the conjecture to be true but provided no details about the proof then the first comment should absolutely be about lack of transparency.
> no details about the proof
replydo you really imagine a scenario where OpenAI would claim to solve it and not give details about the proof? how is this even possible? why would anyone believe them?