If you're literally using it as code autocomplete that's not functionally true. But it's still neither well specified nor a good idea.
replyDomain modelling as well: we have clear programming concepts, but the kind of autocomplete that can autocomplete a customer sales process needs to be able to refer/leverage ontological connections on words like ‘bass’, ‘season’, ‘rebate’, and ‘jamboree’.
replyIntuitively it feels like focused models should be better models, but human programmers are ‘better’ knowing programming alongside general stuff. We’re not reduced by reading economics or Tolkien, removing such knowledge would be premature optimization.
Thanks..non AI expert here just wanted to understand..cos one of the most talked about topics is running models locally on cheaper hardware. Helps many esp in poorer places.
replyWould be nice if a genuinely useful coding model can fit into an old laptop, give decent performance and know nothing but (say) Go or c language.
But I see yours + others points.