upvote
And there's nothing wrong with that. Many languages attempt to do the same thing. Why bother with 15 different languages if you can leverage one?

See also LiveView and Hologram for Elixir.

reply
Agreed, looks like it's reinventing the wheels. Frameworks does not really matter today, AI agents write the code anyway.
reply
But AI do benefit a lot from a strict compiler, and having a simple language improve a lot on type-safety, so I don't think it is to throw, even today.
reply
But what about compilation speed? Hot reload? Maintainability? What is the bus factor for these kind of technologies?

Yea, its cool to have strict type safety, but what's the point of it doesn't have all the benefits from other Frameworks that took years to polish

reply
JaneStreet has enough free cash to not worry about those issues. If one of their key persons dies in service, they can go out and contract the worlds leading expert in that domain, and their annualised rate isn’t even a rounding error on their bottom line.
reply
ocaml has excellent compilation speed, and in my experience the code is very maintainable due to the module and type systems.
reply
AI certainly writes Internet comments so that the flock does not have a single minute to get independent thoughts.
reply
Better frameworks will still help AIs avoid silly mistakes. A smarter framework means you can be productive with a dumber/cheaper AI.
reply