It tells me the way they measure 'livable' is wrong. Given the choice, most people would choose to be in any one of those over where ever they are now, and the cities on 'most livable' lists.
replyThose top 20 livable lists are always pretty narrowly defined though. They’ll mention some pricey cities in Switzerland for sure, and for forget the poor slouches that have to commute into Bern from Freiburg.
replyThat isn’t anywhere close to the definition of livable though
replyHow'd you measure 'livable'? 1. income, 2-n crickets?
replyYes, it tells me the methodology is biased.
replyHahaha. Absolutely on point. Don’t like the outcome? Methodology is bad.
replyNever mind this has been around for decades.
It actually makes perfect sense. In every metric that impacts a persons everyday life the us is almost always dead last among OECD countries. So of course the cites are too.
As someone who lives in Atlanta I can't imagine any way it's the second most livable city in the country.
reply