upvote
If this Baltimore Sun article is accurate, it's worse than that as it sounds like the FCC is overriding a law passed by Congress and not just (re)setting a rule.

> The 39% cap was established by Congress in 2004.

1. https://www.baltimoresun.com/2026/08/06/federal-communicatio...

reply
And what is this Congress going to do about it? Nothing.
reply
Well, you see, under the current administration, everything is allowed.
reply
> Doesn't that mean agencies like this are not free to set their own rules when a law is ambiguous?

Agencies can say whatever they want but courts are not required to defer to them when this inevitably goes to a lawsuit.

reply
Thanks. That actually makes it make more sense, chevron doctrine applied to courts and what they can/can't do.

Edit: made applies past tense

reply
The law isn't ambiguous.
reply
True, I tried to convey that.
reply
The difference in this case is that the victims are the general public, who don't even own a single lobbyist and can be safely ignored.
reply