upvote
Sure, but you can hardly expect to interact with the world in a rational way if you explicitly decide to ignore it
reply
Look at this statement from the article:

>These racks are needed to keep up with the ballooning requirements of each new "frontier" (a buzzword label with no actual inclination of performance of improvement) model developed, which everyone bought into the AI hype will immediately hop to because it's all novelty over utility.

This is a mind-blowingly clueless assertion. This is not a person capable of rationally assessing facts. At best this kind of writing is interesting as an artifict of human delusion and cognitive bias.

reply
> This is a mind-blowingly clueless assertion. This is not a person capable of rationally assessing facts. At best this kind of writing is interesting as an artifict of human delusion and cognitive bias.

How do you figure? This description would be best applied to you:

* Musk both wildly wealthy because of his popularity and simultaneously incompetent

* Musk and other investors have made boatloads of money off the promise that specifically american, boutique LLMs will deliver labor savings. in his case spaces, but it's indistinguishable from similar frauds such as eg openai, anthropic, etc

* Musk's properties will likely collapse unless they can find new revenue or investors.

Musk can only grift so many people before his bottom falls out

reply
There is plenty of the world that doesn't behave this way.

Flipping it around: Can you tell me why I need to interact with such articles? What did I lose by not reading it? I can certainly tell you what I gained.

reply
Should people disengage with Hn because they don't like your opinion?
reply
> Should people disengage with Hn because they don't like your opinion?

Neither I, nor the person you're responding to (tommica) suggested anything of the sort.

reply