undefined

points

[-]

Is there any model that knows how to smooth an overly literary text over? I find Opus and Fable constantly decorate the documentation they write like a damn 19/20th century writer. We're working with IT stuff yet it writes like it's going to win some Pulitzer prize. It's that one thing I don't get why they can't train them to do properly: I have not encountered a model yet that sticks to the current language of the domain it's tasked with.

by msp2635 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

Not sure how to fully fix this but I remember a session last week where I got so fed up mid way though reading a response that I used the following:

"give me this again without jargon invented this session at high density

and with a couple (maybe more or less) simple useful ascii diagrams underneath each design"

The context is that I was discussing an experimental new idea for my video game review analysis product.

Designs 1,2, and 3 were horrible: the model even suggested a rejection after the word soup so it would have been pointless to waste my fleeting time on Earth reading it.

Otherwise, I generally really enjoyed using fable for bouncing ideas. It was an absolute joy to have this thing provide useful criticism, analyse sample data, and create prototypes so that I could elevate my understanding of the problem without stepping down from a pure intuition/design headspace.

But I don't consider the purely model written code usable for a feature this important. I'll probably scrap it entirely and start from scratch with newfound understanding.