upvote
Most official Rust projects are dual MIT/Apache licensed by convention [1] (and most Rust libraries from third parties I've seen that are open source MIT follow the MIT/Apache dual license), so seems like this library shouldn't just be AGPL for a typical political choice of a Rustacean?

[1]: https://rust-lang.org/policies/licenses/

reply
official projects are usually run by sensible people who want to do things and aren't leading with ideology.

We're literally talking about an "X but in Rust" project already...

reply