If the activities were truly cool and impactful, and not illegal or unlawful as you suggest, wouldn’t it be possible that the suicide could be due to a culture of not speaking out and then left to deal with the after effect of guilt? A slanderous retort vs a different lens to review the events isn’t helpful
replyI seriously doubt the GP (who was proud of their work) was one of the suicides. If they were, the mere fact that they are able to post here after taking their own life would be the far bigger story.
replySo we're to trust an anon supposed ex officer saying they're doing good things there despite all the clear evidence to the contrary?
replyIt's possible that they think they are doing good things according to their moral framework. There are hundreds of millions of people with truly insane moral frameworks.
replyIt's possible that their particular job was, as far as they know, doing good things according to most moral frameworks.
I have strong doubts that everyone who kills people by clicking on them on a computer screen thinks that what they are doing is wholly compatible with their personal moral framework. Presumably, some of those people feel very guilty about what they do.
Kills people by clicking on them? WTF?
replyThis is about network security, defending against cyber attacks. You may or may not agree that we should have people doing that, but conflating it with imagined nonsense like this is counterproductive.
What do you think drone operators and their support staff do?
replyWhy do you think this has anything to do with drone operators?
reply