I can be against animal testing without being a chemist or having a full understanding of the experiments being made on them. Knowing it's cruelty is enough to make opposition a valid and defensible position.

I doubt that it is more efficient for someone to routinely watch every line of output or stop to review terminal commands, rather than waiting for the turn to complete.

It is a broader debate about agentic AI, and whether one should relinquish control to the tool rather than aim for full understanding of every action taken.

The people arguing for a hands-on, fully in control approach are losing ground by the week, in my opinion.

He didn't advocate for being completely blind in every way. You might care about working conditions without understanding how the textiles, dyes or cotton production works.

These non-programmers probably shouldnt use computers at all, right, since they don't understand them?