upvote

points

by paul_h4 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby usef-4 hours ago|
next
[-]
That's exactly why Auto mode was made, and reportedly what they all use. It's the easy option, with a better safety score than human review.

(This isn't vibes: they're red-teaming Auto mode heavily)

reply
upvoteby ValentineC2 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
> It's the easy option, with a better safety score than human review.

Considering I went through a phase before I started using Claude Code where I'd eventually reach a point where I'd mindlessly approve ridiculously long command chains, I believe this.

As the article writes: "many users are clicking through reflexively rather than reviewing each command".

It's far better (for my working style, anyway) to have some external isolation/sandboxing, but leave the actual command approval to LLM.

reply
upvoteby coldtea3 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
>with a better safety score than human review.

According to them - for things they care about.

reply
upvoteby coldtea3 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
>else they'd work on the usability of the massively imperfect 1-approve-once and 2-approve-forever multi-choice and outcome.

Their profit motive is in NOT improving that, and luring you to depend all the more automatically to Claude.

reply
upvoteby dannyw4 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
Maybe by design?

1. Metrics show auto or YOLO mode users have higher retention

2. Company intentionally doesn’t invest in manual mode

reply