upvote
Well obviously it's more prevalent. But you don't know what the prevalence would have been had Mars bars not shrunk, ie it could have been worse.

Not that I actually believe that Mars bar size had any meaningful effect, but your rhetorical question is nonsensical.

reply
Not sure what point you are making, it is more prevalent now, but it would be wrong to say this is because mars bars are more expensive and smaller.
reply
I am responding to a comment that is framing the reduced size as a good thing from an obesity perspective...
reply