I'd say it's closer to a Roomba then a hammer -- if you just let a Roomba run around your living room, can you say you vacuumed?
replyWell, you tell your Roomba "clean the floor" but you don't ask an AI "make a game". You give it very specific instructions.
replySpecific compared to writing procedural code> Barely even by analogy, IMO
replyOne could even argue what defines AI instructability is heuristics as opposed to specifics
A far more accurate analogy would be people saying someone didn't write a book if they hired a ghostwriter, which is generally acknowledged to be true. LLMs are much closer to being a ghostwriter than they are to an inert, non-powered hand tool.
replyI wouldn't even compare it to a tool. People frequently "build their own house" where they sub out 75% of the skilled labor and act as a General Contractor/glorified gopher.
replyAnd you won't get purity tests from the layperson: in the end, you're responsible for the build quality so if you tirelessly labor/oversee those teams you're considered capable; if it ends sub-par, then you're a stooge.
deleted
reply> That's like saying you aren't building a house if you use a hammer to drive nails instead of your hand. AI is just a tool like any other, and you use it to build things like you would any other tool.
replyA coding agent is more like a carpenter, a mason, an electrician,... rather than a hammer in that case.
> AI is just a tool like any other
replyReally? Last time I checked, other tools can operate without ripping off the works of millions of humans.