> Used to push surveillance meanwhile actual harm against children goes ignored.
replyWorse, these laws will actually create new harms to children who will be forced to give their identity to websites and identity services that will exploit them and fail to protect that data.
What do you think about California AB1043?
replyEpstein is real, the “grooming gangs” are not, unless you’re talking about Jimmy Saville.
replyThis is flagrantly untrue https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploit...
replyFirst sentence: "From the late 1980s until 2013..."
replyso the grandparent commentor has broken UK law by knowingly sharing false information. over here officer, a thoughtcrime has taken place!
reply[flagged]
replyThis is clearly an AI bot. Watch it automatically respond to my comment.
replyYou’re breaking site guidelines and you also did not post proof.
replyI think OP is referring to stuff like the Rupert Lowe’s Rape Gang Inquiry
replyWhat about it?
reply[dead]
replyTBF they are real, but are they isolated to one ethnic group? No.
Are the victims as numerous as Rupert Lowe's report makes it out to be? No.
replyI haven't seen any claim that it was isolated to one ethnic group. I have only seen the claim that it was disproportionately immigrants of Pakistani background.
replyEpstein and grooming gangs are both real. Not that the whole "grooming gangs" problem hasn't been vastly amplified and turned into a repeated media talking point by a bunch of the extreme right wing in the UK, however. There's plenty of domestic non south asian pedos and molestors there too.
reply[dead]
reply