undefined

points

[-]

The question you're asking has nothing to do with who has the burden of proof when it comes to claims about Pangram, but I'll answer it anyway.

Today, the best way is probably Pangram. Tomorrow, it might not be, especially if they try to push their recall up.

You might have to make peace with the fact that there may not always be a tool that does what you want.

[-]

So Pangram is the best one right now, that all I need to know, and I can safely assume that the Claude AI marks will make it even stronger.

Thanks!

> But the burden of proof is on them...

I mean is this enough proof?

Or is this marketing, a public stunt or not real research?

I think this is enough for me to know they are actually improving their AI slop detector.