upvote
In Canada that list is used by foreign telemarketers to spam us. Our enforcement authorities just shrug and say the criminals are not in our jurisdiction. That being said, my phone is pretty good at stopping it.
reply
It works versus serious companies cold calling you. Scammers and semi-scammers still call. There is some need to adress what it doesn't solve too.
reply
Dude, what country? In Spain or Sweden, I literally don't receive any calls from unknowns anymore, scammers nor telemarketing. Please specify the country so we can know what country you're talking about, and what the name of the list you enrolled in is.

Worth knowing for people who might not know; large telemarketing companies have campaigns on the internet to spread FUD about the effectiveness of these lists, so less people enroll. I'm not claiming that you is one of these, but unless we're being clear what lists/countries we're talking about here, it's borderline FUD rather than helpful to the conversation.

reply
You think scammers don't call you because you are on the opt-in no-call list? These are not good faith actors, they don't care you're on a list.
reply
why do you assume Spain and Sweden are representative and not the US or Canada? I'm curious how many people live in countries with effective versions of this list vs not

in either case instead of a do not call list, they should be banned completely from calling any number in the country. you could do it by prefix if you wanted to still use the list mechanically, maybe? But the only reason I see for an opt in list is to allow the marketing companies to still exist

reply
> why do you assume Spain and Sweden are representative and not the US or Canada?

... I don't? I'm just want to know what country ferngodfather is talking about, as I'm sure the experience differs a lot by country, made evident by countless of comments in this submission.

> in either case instead of a do not call list, they should be banned completely from calling any number in the country.

I don't disagree with this, but for people suffering from these daily spam calls today, there might be ways to fix that, in a shorter time-frame than "petition the government, then propose a law, then get the law into agreement, then get the law into effect". If we're being clear about what countries people are talking about, there wouldn't be so much FUD about the subject.

reply
Most people here are American, and your reply comes off as standoffish
reply
> Most people here are American

Whaaaat? On a American website, driven by a American VC company, are you sure? That has nothing to do with anything in the conversation...

If someone talks about "Most countries" they're not actually talking about some percentage of countries in the world generally, they're specifically talking about "most countries I know about", so when people start being fuzzy about those sort of details, it'd help all of us (not the ones from specific countries) actually understand what's going on and where. For all we know, they could be talking about India, especially since I've already added non-US context with my previous comment they themselves responded to...

reply
I think in America at least the problem is most of these seem to be scams calls not legitimate. So they are criminals who don’t really care about the law
reply
What country are you in that it doesn't work in?

Maybe he's in France, since this article is about France having to ban all telemarketing calls since the block lists apparently don't work.

Don't let your regional indignation get in the way of doing basic logic.

reply
> Maybe he's in France, since this article is about France having to ban all telemarketing calls since the block lists apparently don't work.

How on earth am I supposed to assume they live in France, just because that's in the submission article? Conversations in the comments regularly go beyond the scope of the article, and even the commentator themselves said "Most countries" so clearly they're talking about more than just one.

reply