upvote
I just looked it up and anti-vax arguments predate actual vaccines - they were used for variolation which was similar:

>in a 1722 sermon entitled "The Dangerous and Sinful Practice of Inoculation", the English theologian Reverend Edmund Massey argued that diseases are sent by God to punish sin and that any attempt to prevent smallpox via inoculation is a "diabolical operation"

Vaccines date from about 1800.

reply
I would blame the "social" media, on the old internet they had barely any visibility.

Now that we have the blame let's talk about the punishment.

reply
> I would blame the "social" media, on the old internet they had barely any visibility.

They managed to get plenty of visibility long before computers.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leicestershire-50713991

> There followed a 100-year battle between the authorities and an often sceptical, sometimes aggressive, public. In Britain, a succession of laws made vaccinations free, then compulsory - backed by fines and even imprisonment. While riots flared in some towns, there was also more restrained opposition in the form of anti-vaccination leagues. For an increasingly literate population, pamphlets were produced with titles like "Vaccination: its fallacies and evils", "Vaccination, a Curse" and the suitably Gothic "Horrors of Vaccination".

reply
I do not disagree, but I don't remember antivax to be visible in pre-facebook internet either, so I only blame it for ~current wave
reply
It was there, and growing for decades. Pre Facebook it was a small niche but don't blame Facebook, that is mostly coincidence
reply
Pre-facebook, the barrier of entry was high enough that only fairly educated, students, and the nerds were driving the content.

Once the barrier came down and the floodgates of "average intelligence" were opened, it was over.

reply
deleted
reply