As if projects haven't used to have a coding style. What's so hard in saying that code should be formatted with Black, yapf, ruff etc, beats me.
replyLiterally within this thread someone has already suggested using ruff instead of Black and nobody here are colleagues.
replyIt's a silly argument and the lowest form of bike-shedding on the level of tabs vs commas. People with no other substantive contributions use formatting as a beard.
replyThe first one to choose it (whatever it happens to be) wins and that's the end of it. If it isn't the end of it you've got a talent issue.
> It's a silly argument and the lowest form of bike-shedding on the level of tabs vs commas
replyGuess what other low-level bike-shedding argument 'go fmt' obviates? That's right - tabs vs spaces!
> If it isn't the end of it you've got a talent issue.
I know you meant this as a slur, but the implication is Go works better than other languages for those who have what you call "a talent issue"
Bad example. Ruff's formatter has the same style as Black. It's documented as a "drop-in replacement". The difference is mostly performance.
replyIn any case, that's a single decision the project lead takes once.