I know that. We don't know what the prompt was. We only have a self-assessment of the quality of the prompt from the person who wrote it.

It sounds like they're hitting a data source quality issue, which is hardly uncommon in scraping.

It's common for job boards to obscure who the real clients are, and if the scraping engine is LLM powered ( rather than LLM written ), then I would expect it to accidentally present agencies as the contracting organisation sometimes.

Breaking down the process so you can inspect the messy middle of a data pipeline is an important part of software engineering, but it sounds like they've tossed a messy task at an LLM and expected it to be proficient end-to-end.