Do you have examples? Ideally a startup that isn’t itself selling AI to other AI companies

Debt is debt. Some of it is absolutely worth taking on.

I don’t have any issue with intentional debt when you understand the trade-off and have a clear payoff plan.

That's only one of the three reasons in the article: 1) Reviewer burden - LLMs can produce a deluge plausible but incorrect code which can overwhelm human reviewers. 2) Safety and Security - Many corporations depend on the JDK so stability is a high priority. 3) Copyright/IP about who owns submissions generated by AI is not settled in law.

The article also goes on to compare the JDK teams policy to GraalVM, also in Oracle which is more similar to the Linux kernel policy, where AI submissions are allowed, but the human submitter is accountable to them, which is reasonable too.

It's not unreasonable, in my opinion, for the JDK team to limit AI contributions based on their stated priorities, just like how other teams might not require those same restrictions.

Oracle banned AI code from a public project they maintain and backport/share with a commercial product because they're a very litigious company, anticipating future legal cases.

It strongly argues against a position that many people including myself have taken, that all code will soon be AI code and the only people still writing code by hand are those who haven’t gotten the memo. (I don’t mean to rule out the possibility that Oracle, despite their involvement in AI infrastructure, is just being dumb and the lawyers made them create a policy that’s not compatible with the modern practice of software development.)