upvote
He went in for a monitored taking of the test.
reply
Sure, sure. So now we have the worst of all possible worlds: an expensive interview process where the candidate has to be onsite, and a stupid evaluation mechanism that doesn't at all reflect real-world job requirements. And in exchange for the inconvenience of an in-person interview, the candidate gets treated like a number and is met with a stupid memorization gauntlet that tests a skill that quite literally will never be used again now that we have AI. Sounds great.

Man, there are times when I really hate this industry.

reply
> Man, there are times when I really hate this industry.

Or as I'd like to call it - Wednesday :)

reply