Yes... Just use DEB package files for any distro. Make a compatibility layer that is distro dependent so that it can come preinstalled on any distro. It converts the DEB package to a distro native package so that it doesn't fuck up existing packages or the existing distro-native package manager, and gives you the apt and dpkg commands . Unlike appimages and flatpaks it has no reviewer, no store and it can be installed just like EXEs on windows which is already the case for DEBs on debian and debian based distros. Would this work?
replyLOL!
replyThough as someone who shipped commercial software on Linux, it wasn't that bad, you just had to ship everything other than the kernel.
LOL. Conveniently, electron is everything other than the kernel. Also, as much wasted RAM as an entire second instance of chrome that shares nothing, but oh well.
reply> LOL. Conveniently, electron is everything other than the kernel. Also, as much wasted RAM as an entire second instance of chrome that shares nothing, but oh well.
replyWell, with RAM being so cheap, why bother trying to trying to be memory efficient? It's not like OpenAI has an infinite pool of "AI" software engineers to work on this...
Oh wait...
Yeah, but if you use Qt like I did, you're shipping libstdc++, some other crap and Qt.
replyYeah, I was kind of surprised recently that there's no solid native way to build desktop apps on Linux! I was thinking I'd build something actually native with AI but then the options were QT or or gtk...
replyQt is as solid as it gets. It's very, very high quality. Much higher quality than Microsoft's frameworks on Windows.
replyWell yes, I was surprised by the situation in Windows too! So my stack is now split like this
reply- Apple: SwiftUI/AppKit
- Android: Jetpack
- Windows + Linux: Avalonia (C#)
Avalonia seems good so far. I couldn't do Qt because I can't deal with that qBittorrent look. GTK is aesthetically pleasing for me, but it only runs on Linux. Avalonia lets me target both of these UI-toolkit-less platforms with something native-ish. Flutter is probably good too, but I am using uniffi-rs and that doesn't generate Dart bindings AFAIK.
Would love to hear other options.
Isn't Qt themeable? I also recall at one point they "emulated" native widget look and feel in their own renderer but I might be misremembering.
replyIndeed! I wrote my note-taking app with a block editor (like Notion) in Qt with QML for the UI and C++ for the logic and it's been an incredible experience![1]
replyVery nice, thank you for sharing!
replyHow would you know? It's impossible to have done a thorough analysis of all the Windows UI frameworks, five have been released since I started typing...
replyYou don't care what were you trying to build but for a quick me alone Linux app I used Flutter.
Honestly it's my go-to when I want to have a quick native app on any platform but dont want to bundle electron.
replyFlutter is solid choice, and Canonical seems to be putting weight behind it for Ubuntu as well. Canonical is also now the new lead maintainer of Flutter Desktop.
replyQT and GTK are as native (and solid, I guess) as it gets, since there's no "default" UI toolkit that's shipped along with the kernel, unlike e.g. Windows or macOS. Speaking of Windows, why do they even ship browser-UI apps as a part of the OS? Do they find native Windows UI development too hard or feature-limited even with LLM assistance?
replyBecause Microsoft screwed up their native UI story. They are slowly starting to go native again with WinUI3, but Microsoft went through a rough period with UI frameworks, I mean how many do they have now all still "supported"? WinForms, WPF, MFC, WinUI, MAUI, etc.?
replyWell what does native mean? An XWindow? Native on gnome is different from native on kde or xfce or lxde…
replyI mean there is the no true linux argument, but covering the main stream desktops you basically have kde which is written with qt(so qt is native) or gnome which is written with gtk and both frameworks/DEs do implement other things besides "just" the gui, so you are native.
replyMicrosoft used to ship a Linux binary for Teams, but they stopped doing that. Guess the tech was lost.
replyIt sucked.
replyDownload Edge for Linux and use the PWA. It's still crap but at least it kind of works mostly.
I'm not usually one to defend Microsoft, but since Teams works great in a browser, I actually prefer it that way. My video conference doesn't need access to my whole filesystem and an opacity layer that prevents me from seeing what it does. I actually applaud them for supporting browsers as well as they do.
replyYes, except it only worked some of the time on some of the distros (mainly Ubuntu/Debian variants of a certain vintage).
replyWith the AI, we can finally have the year of desktop Linux.
replyNonetheless, it's the year og the linux desktop!
replyYeah idk what OpenAI was thinking. Just going off their own claims… OpenAI must be filled with bozos to not be able to utilize their own supposed product capabilities…
replySame with Anthropic and their "support" team, which seems to be Claude 0.1 run on a commodore 64 in the basement...
replyIt's the exact opposite. They picked the easiest way, done countless times just fine by everyone else and still failed
replyAppImage, yawn.
replyI think they were joking...
replyWhat problems are there with appimages?
replyYet I have to install a not very famous, maybe unmaintained daemon to get basic system integration
replyIt is already pre installed in most distrosk
reply