upvote
That should have been obvious from the mere fact that the bottom rungs are almost completely populated by silver-spooned nepo-babies.
reply
> the bottom rungs are almost completely populated by silver-spooned nepo-babies

You’re thinking of investment banking, corporate finance. Trading has always been the place folks from less privileged backgrounds got into finance. In the old days, Jews. (Like, into the 50s.) In the 80s, poor schmucks.

reply
I know a lot of traders from both university and growing up around rich kids. Their parents are invariably very wealthy. They were the ones who had the time and safety net to sit around on computers all the time (like me becoming a programmer)

I’m not in the trading world though so I haven’t met the ones that don’t fit this description.

But exactly zero of the people I know who were raised in either poverty or mediocrity are traders or involved in finance, aside from maybe accounting.

Of course, this is all anecdotal - but I’ve only ever seen Bloomberg terminals outside of office settings in the apartments of wealthy children.

Perhaps things were a bit different decades ago, in the scrappy past, but it feels like most higher earning spheres are closing in around pre-existing wealth.

reply
> I’m not in the trading world

I was. Algorithmic derivatives. The rich kids went into banking. Their connections bought deal flow. Those of us from public universities mostly went into trading. It’s why it’s been looked down on within Wall Street since basically ever.

> I’ve only ever seen Bloomberg terminals outside of office settings in the apartments of wealthy children

Parents buying their kids Bloomberg terminals aren’t looking for them to get into trading, they’re training them to start a hedge fund.

(I’d also guess a minority of folks with a BB are traders. It’s really more of a vetted calling card.)

reply
Why would a trader need your consent to make a trade with somebody else?
reply
I assumed they were referring to market crashes caused by irresponsible levels of risks and deceptive practices like we saw in 2008, and/or government-funded bailouts
reply
That was not caused by trading. It was caused by irresponsible lending and deceptive securitisation of that debt.

Trading can bring down a bank (e.g.Barings) but is not a big systemic risk.

reply
why should we have financial regulation at all, is that what you're getting at?
reply
"Capitalism bad" is generally their point
reply
often they're trading things with externalities
reply
It’s pretty bad except that any other way is even worse.
reply