Just a warning, this is on Opus. There's not a clear harness winner. It will change depending on the models.
replyI'm not surprised to also see Cursor above Claude code, their harness is very good.
replyIn what scenarios?
replyIt indexes the code efficiently, seems to find stuff quicker, it has a very nice UI (much better than Claude Codes IMO), it has a nice sub-agent UX which I find triggers more reliably, diffs render nicely. Otherwise it just seems to work in a purely vibes sense.
replyThat said Claude Code is perfectly fine. I just prefer the integrated experience of using Cursors since I already use VSCode, but I still mostly use Claude Code because of their Max/Fable plan.
Can OpenCode dispatch background subagents yet? I tried it a week ago and saw nothing. This is 99% of my workflow at this point.
replyHaving just "asked" my opencode instance-- Yes, but it's behind an experimental flag and not necessarily feature-complete.
replyIn the new v2 beta, yes. Major QoL upgrade, so much less sitting around waiting.
replyThe v2 branch of OpenCode has not been touched for months, if it's beeing developed then I don't know where.
replythis is very easy to check. i promise i'm not tricking you and just uploaded this. https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/tree/v2
replythis is the integration branch for https://opencode.ai/v2 . it has been for months. it's where the Effect-based refactor has been landing.
[dead]
reply