Do you seriously think looking at websites, no matter what kind of websites, is more damaging than separating a children from his or her god damn parents and throwing them into the pit of neglect and abuse called the foster care system?
Get serious. This is not a suggestion on how to protect kids. The kids have everything to lose and nothing to earn under your system.
In the future the state will raise children giving all children an equal chance of a good future. Poor children are less likely to get into good schools and careers where rich families can buy a better future.
Think of the children.
> ... and I don't take specific action to entice children into the service
What part of these services have been designed to be inherently addictive do you have a hard time understanding?
It's very strange that you can be aware of the fact that Facebook et. al. have been trying to get kids addicted and then pretend that there's no "specific action" to entice them.
> The slipperly slope here to avoid is this: do you really want to adopt a model where the state is the one who "owns" your child (except financially, of course, you still have to pay everything) and can unilaterally do things to you and your child in the same of child safety without your input or consent?
So you're okay with a model where private companies intentionally get your kids addicted to digital crack and can unilaterally sell all their personal information, advertise all sorts of harmful products and services to them, let predators target and contact them, etc.?
It's angels and saviors like you who make the world a living hell.
Those who say how can I tell my child they can't have what others in school have. Then yoi are letting other parents raise your child.