This is a pretty insincere take.
replyFeel free to elaborate on my alleged insincerity. Was I insincere in noticing that there are partisan patterns at play, or insincere when pointing out that the govt should have more control over govt-run/taxpayer funded programs, as opposed to transactions between private parties?
replyI am sincerely curious to know your opinion.
[flagged]
replyYou obviously do not know what the word "sincere" means. Please look it up before posting further.
replyReplying to your edit:
replyAmazing that you again allege insincerity, with zero evidence. You then go on to make false claims about what I said and avoid the obvious point that my problem is not with the historical figure that you quoted, but the fact that you injected race into a conversation that was about food.
As for whether you violate the HN guidelines, the number of your recent comments that are greyed out tends to indicate that I'm not the only one who thinks you're out of step here.
How does any of this make my comment insincere? Even if I agreed with it, I wouldn't understand how it proves your original accusation.
replyI also don't love your injection of flame-bait racial comments, which probably violate HN guidelines.