That's because his examples are obvious and not at all interesting, since we've already seen them.
replyHis original claim amounts to creating an AI that takes its place above humans as some kind of electronic God, delivering edicts to humanity that we cannot comprehend, but which somehow have value to us. It's unskeptical, pseudo-religious nonsense.
I don't see that at all. Nowhere did this person evoke placing AI above people or even remotely evoke religious imagery. You imagined that yourself, and that creeps me out.
replyIt’s right here:
replyThe age of humans comprehending things is coming to an end [1]
That does not place AI above humans and neither does it evoke anything religious.
replyLook at it this way. AI has destroyed humanity at chess for decades now. That doesn't mean we have placed AI above humans in the general sense.
You have basically totally fabricated what you thought the other person was saying.