upvote
> Meanwhile people here are posting the thesis that agentic development without careful code review results in an unmaintainable application.

> I theorize that this is not something they experienced in practice, because it did not happen for me.

Are you currently maintaining the application? Like it's in production with paying users? You've only been on the app for 4 months. Compare that to something like Emacs that has been going for 40+ years. You can make a better case when you've been on prod for a few years.

reply
By that standard, we could have AGI tomorrow, and I should still not comment.

No, my app is not published yet. It will probably take another month, with hopefully no complications arising out of the AppStore review process.

Then, I hope the ad campaign financials work out to compete with old apps of a lower quality that already boast no less than a million reviews.

I get it, you want me to make a case that can objectively convince you of the usefulness of agentic development without code review.

From my perspective, I have no interest in doing so, and I can only share my experience so far. In a few months time we will know more objectively whether my ambitions paid off.

Until then, you will either have to take my word for the quality of the product, or spend tens to hundreds of hours of effort in trying the approach for yourself. OP's article does not contain any specifics for where and how supposedly agentic development failed him either.

reply