> they never think to ask “why does regulation x exist?”
replyThey do, but they think the answer is always some riff on, "government overreach because bureaucrats need to justify their jobs."
That attitude has been firmly ingrained into (at least) a generation of people.
TBF, a solid 50% of regulation is probably government overreach. The problem is that it's intrinsically tangled with the other 50% (crossing various specializations/laws/departments) that isn't; you can't undo one without undoing both.
replylove the use of "solid" when both numbers (50, and the other 50) are pure unobtanium pulled out of an orifice.
reply"a lot" would be less rhetorically satisfying, but probably more appropriate.
I suspect the number is in fact, far less than 50%. In mining engineering, I'd be amazed if a significant majority of the rules don't stem from a significant accident or death, or forseeable need to avoid them. In medicine, the stakes are equally high. Building codes? It depends. The cost of tunnelling in NY isn't because of government compliance.
In building codes, sometimes there's a tragedy that causes government overreach. A death with big public support often causes regulation that "does something" even if the rule itself doesn't help or make sense.
replyPropaganda works.
reply