upvote
Now suppose four of your teammates, each have three PR’s in the backlog and you have to explain to your manager that you’re the bottleneck.
reply
As quoted from my comment: "My manager is also 100% with this."
reply
And he has bosses. And are they okay with some whatever being an obstacle to work getting done? Probably not.
reply
That's on him to handle and it hasn't been a problem.
reply
When it's a problem, you should both expect to be unemployed fairly rapidly. Progress isn't going to stop solely because you want to pick 'excessively long comments' as a hill to die on.
reply
You're really insistent on project your personal biases onto a person and company you do not even know the identity of.

Turns out not every team has the idea of "progress" being yet another iteration of "more code submitted = better code". Some people actually desire or need to make quality products.

reply
"Progress"
reply
... Poor branch names?
reply
[flagged]
reply
Coupled with the other comment of yours that was flagged, the tone of this is completely unacceptable.
reply
Maybe consider some anger management therapy? Nothing you’re talking about is in any way acceptable. Physical violence at work? You can’t be serious.
reply
Its not petty is, Im not changing our standards because people got hot new toys. These are code policies we've had. If your AI usage can not conform to them, that's on you, not me.
reply
[flagged]
reply
Why can't people just follow the guidelines. You really want to get into a fight over not following established and agreed upon guidelines and code quality standards?
reply
[flagged]
reply