upvote
They don't "always believe this", this will lead to your account being banned eventually, or at least barred from returning products.
reply
Not true.

I've been a prime account member in good standing for over 5 years now.

I order thousands of dollars worth of stuff every year.

They're not cancelling my account. Ever.

They seriously don't give a shit. They're not paying these costs. It's all covered. They are not the same company who delivers or insures.

reply
I certainly hope so. GP implies that they are committing fraud to "stick it to the man". Nine times out of ten, this simply results in the man sticking it to us again.
reply
Amazon is not "the man".

They are for-profit corporation, not our government.

There's a difference.

reply
The phrase "the man" means (roughly) "the establishment". The two biggest components of that are the government and big corporations.
reply
deleted
reply
I would be pretty surprised if Amazon insures their package delivery. Do you have a source for them using insurance?

Maybe when they use a 3rd party delivery service they can strongarm that service into eating the loss. But, where I am, Amazon is usually doing 1st party delivery.

(the reason I assume they don't is that a) they are big enough to eat any loss and b) losses happen at a pretty constant rate. So they would basically be paying an insurer $loss_amount * (1+insurer_margin) in premiums to immediately get payed back $loss_amount. not a great deal.)

reply
Most likely they're sticking it to a delivery contractor. Amazon gets paid, you get your free stuff, and some working class stiff is peeing in a bottle driving a leased truck and not getting paid for their labor. Win win win, right?
reply
You seriously believe the guy peeing in the bottle during deliveries is the one who eats the charge?

This isn't a restaurant and they're not waiters.

reply
I bet they don't see a line-item deduction, but they're paid a lot less than they should be for their work.

What about Amazon's business and subcontracting practices makes you think they're willing to eat any operating expenses whatsoever?

reply