upvote
EU law doesn't actually require a monopoly for competition rules to apply, it's a "dominant position". Apple certainly meets that definition for smartphone platforms.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/glossary/competit...

reply
Geez even the EU's own government websites are polluted with cookie banners. Apparently they can't resist tracking their visitors either.
reply
Distribution of software on iOS?
reply
That isn't one by law.
reply
Which law? Seems like it is under EU law.
reply
Any country in the world with working democracy, there is a very precise definition of what monopoly is.
reply
> In law, a monopoly is a business entity that has significant market power, that is, the power to charge overly high prices, which is associated with unfair price raises.[3] Although monopolies may be big businesses, size is not a characteristic of a monopoly. A small business may still have the power to raise prices in a small industry (or market).[3]

All countries with a working democracy would class Apple as a monopoly as it has significant market power, enough to distort prices.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly

reply
Not for the nerd definition of iOS as a market.

The market is mobile devices.

reply
A market is the set of things which are fungible substitutes for each other. Essentially every brand of gasoline is in the same market. By contrast, gasoline and diesel are separate markets, because some vehicles require gasoline and can't use diesel and others the other way around. They're not substitutes when your vehicle can only use one of them and you can't get out of it by trying to claim that the market is all types of fuel.

Now suppose you have an iPhone and want to download an app, or want to distribute your app to customers many of which have an iPhone. What substitute for Apple's store is available to do that?

reply
The same way you have a Playstation and don't want to pay Sony for the game.
reply
We aren't talking about nerd definitions. We are talking about the real world.

Apple can change their rules and it materially impacts the market.

reply
The real world is that outside US, Apple hardly has a monopoly in mobile phones.
reply
Apple and google essentially own 99%+ of the smartphone market, so it's not that different from a monopoly
reply
Duopoly
reply
iPhone apps.

If it helps, think if Windows apps had a 5% Microsoft tax and had to be approved by Apple.

reply
deleted
reply
I assume you mean approved by Microsoft.

When they were found in the US to have a monopoly, they had around 95% of personal computer operating system share. Apple isn’t even close.

reply
Just because they took too long to look at a problem, does not stop something else from being a problem.
reply
Really? What would you estimate is Apple's market share of iPhone apps if it's so far below 95%?
reply
We both know that the market share refers to the smartphone market share of which Apple has about 21%.

For iPhone apps Apple is way behind with about 0.005% of the total 2.17 million iPhone apps.

reply
The ONLY interesting market share here isn't how many apps Apple create, or how large share of the smartphones they have. It's how much of the distribution of apps they control on iOS (which easily reaches the bar of being a market in itself).

I.e. the monopoly question is: if apple takes X% for each app in this market, and a competitor can't take less, then it's a monopoly.

reply
'Monopoly' is the wrong term. It's abuse of market power.
reply