> Yeah it’s great for prompting for improvements, granted you can actually judge the suggestions for yourself. They’re often slightly or majorly bad.

I agree with this comment.

That being said, the major errors in some of the suggestions make me terrified of the people who say things like "AI is great for researching and strategizing".

I don't think these people are on the whole engaged or knowledgeable enough to understand the dead ends that AI research is leading them to or the concepts that it doesn't (or can't) discuss.

Really I just feel like AI has turned subpar engineers into dangerous, supercharged Dunning-Kruger cases. Everyone backing AI code generation online acts like a "10x developer", and I think the point of the AI coding tools are to make you feel that way.

I think most of you would be better off slowing down and writing the code by hand in a focused, methodical manner.