> Comes across cheap
replyGiven this is open-source, have you considered contributing a more expensive-feeling landing page? Or, donating to finance the project?
I would rather it feel dev-cheap than corpo-cheap. Throw your MD doc into a basic CSS reset/theme, with a github and download link.
reply>Even if its proofread and factually correct it just comes across as cheap and low effort
replyHow so?
Because it is cheap and low effort.
replyIt indicates that the author likes to take shortcuts and avoid work.
replyThe best devs I ever worked with are the ones that liked to 'take shortcuts and avoid work'.
replyDoes he need to write his own HTML in notepad? Using any kind of template is a shortcut and avoiding work.
replyThis is a pathetic take.
1) Life is short and shortcuts and avoiding work are not inherently the wrong path to take.
2) Is the code you've almost certainly had an LLM write for you in the past a sign that you have low moral character and let yourself down by taking shortcuts and avoiding work too?
replyIt just feels hollow and cheap.
replyThe FAQ technique is LLM/SEO crumbs because people usually search for questions, if you have the exact likely question text that maps to user's search you're more likely to rank. It's unfortunate but it works, like open mouth YouTube thumbnails.
replyIt’s still hollow and cheap. I closed those sites immediately even before LLMs. You need to pay me to waste my time, not the other way around. Even if that’s using your then not-so-free app.
replyThat’s not feedback, just a non-constructive opinion. As someone else wrote above, if you’re so precious about it then help out the devs of the project and submit design PRs.
replyThis is absurd. No one has an obligation to help anyone nor do they owe you any standard of help. Opinion on quality of output is constructive to the wise and an opportunity to scream "If you can do better than do it" for the small minded.
reply[flagged]
reply