The readme and 100% of the code - according to that readme - was also AI.
replyIf you came up with the design of the parser for the decompiled graphs, then I’m glad to still be impressed.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s a cool project… and I was actually impressed and excited
> 100% of the code - according to that readme - was also AI
replyI only briefly scanned it - are you referring to Claude being an extensive commit contributor?
Yes, as in 100% :-(
replyWhy not rip and replace the parts of the readme then?
replyIt's like making a beautiful chocolate praline and shipping it in a shoe.
Maybe don't feel entitled to the author's time? Perhaps he'd rather spend time playing the games that the software patched, instead of spending time doing writing for you.
replybut not any of the actual work.
replyDesigning a parser and deciding how to solve the problem isn't work? Writing code is not the only work involved in building something.
replyI love writing code and avoid using an LLM for pleasure projects, but c'mon, this kind of derisiveness is getting old and tiring.
The Readme is actual work.
replyI quote one of the parent comments: "It's true that Claude wrote most of the Readme... But the design is human :)"
replySo while writing the readme could be considered actual work, it was still not done by the human. So I don't know what your point is.