upvote
This won't work because you consider humans as a logical being (Homosapiens is a misnormer).

People will revolt first should one have to trade physical goods (such as food that we need for daily lives) with computing power.

It only takes a few people to incite.

reply
i like what you did with misnormer. it's like pobody's nerfect.

you are right, there will be revolt definitely. i think computing power will replace a lot of things though.

reply
I agree that the computing power will replace not just softwares and also as many phycial work via robots. I am not smart enough to see further what else are disposable or replaceable
reply
I think this is exactly the bet they're making.

I was totally confused by what connected the two companies until I realized "tokens" are basically a nascent, and rapidly growing, "currency".

reply
Overthinking it. "You have money and need to seem AIish for the stock market, we want real money". You notice they don't do this deal in tokens, they do it in fiat currency.
reply
Except that tokens aren’t completely fungible yet. But, I think we’re approaching the point where it is close enough to be a “proof of work” analog.
reply
I hope we aren't on track for this future and if we are I hope a substantial number of people rebel.

This is among the more hellish futures I can imagine. Our worth as people reduced to how much access we have to compute. Gross.

reply
I hope not;

there are a few assumptions in this future- the biggest one is - we will have to attain a baseline intelligence which is useful for everyone which is not true today. even fable fumbles hard!!

second is that everyone will have to own a medium to use this intelligence (aka robots). like a currency is useless if you can't use it.

to me this is the least daunting scenario. all other scenarios lead to mass slavery.

reply
> the biggest one is - we will have to attain a baseline intelligence which is useful for everyone which is not true today

That's not the biggest assumption.

The biggest assumption I see is that the population will have the baseline understanding of how to operate in this new paradigm, which seems impossible given how useless many people still are with computers

Incidentally, this is also why I think Bitcoin is such a non-starter for most people

reply
It doesn't make much sense as compute isn't all that scarce (relative to other commodities) and will be less so in 15 years.
reply
Does it have to be scarce for it to become a currency? It just needs to be regulated which I think it will be.
reply
[dead]
reply