deleted
replyIt doesn't break supply chain security for anybody with power to change the situation.
replyIt is an easy to overlook this, but even for someone in position of power to change, creating different code with the same hash is borderline impossible.
replyNon-sequitor? They're not providing a (sha-1) hash, they're providing source code to integration partners using their business channels, not public git providers. Those business channels include contracts etc to "secure their supply chain".
replyYou and I aren't in those business channels, and we're not being given anything with a hash. There's simply no hash to collide with?
A git hash is cryptographically secure. It doesn't matter how you distribute it. That is the entire point you're missing.
reply