Yeah, it's obvious enough on its own, but I'll add that Pangram also thinks it's 100% fully AI generated.
replyHypocritical to say the least, given the message.
Pangram sucks
replydeleted
replyI've never seen a false positive from Pangram for human-written text of 300+ words.
replyPangram sucks by seeding fear.
replydeleted
reply[dead]
replyIt's pretty obviously AI written in parts at least.
replyZeroGPT says 21.5% generated.
The angry version is even more obviously AI
replyDeeply ironic that it sure looks like taking the original post, pasting it to an AI with the message "make this angrier" and then simply copy-pasting the output back to the website. In direct violation of their own (supposed) principles.
replyAnd the result isn't even very angry at all. It's like mildly peeved internal company communication (also in direct violation of "don't send this to your manager")
I actually wrote it all myself... The original version was the angrier one only, but people complained that it was too angry, so I tried to smooth it out with another version people could use.
replySee how perverse this "I hate the way AI sounds" thing is?
replyIn the end everyone accusing everyone of being AI.
Half the audience perceives it as AI anyway. Does it matter if you spend the time or do not spend the time to write it? The result is the same.
replyI had the same feeling. The terrible metaphors smells like Claude.
reply> especially the bullets
replyDS9 Garak "especially the lies" reference maybe?
This was actually a small rant from that same day, a colleague had pasted a list of 20 bulletpoints, all of which had some weird stuff in it but overall they were right. This is why I added "Especially the bullets", English is not my main language so I tried to translate myself, but vocabulary sometimes is lacking, sorry about that
reply