upvote
You're reading their comment in isolation. The thread starts with "I assumed something completely different."

You replied to a "still, good to ask in order to seek clarity" type point.

Comment hierarchy is part of the overall context.

reply
Another strange comment, this time from an account made 15 hours ago. My entire point was contextual and not in isolation!
reply
There's no conspiracy, I think people just disagree with what "funding" can mean. A bulk sale in the realm of ~20,000 units is equivalent to stakeholder funding when you're at NeXT's scale. It doesn't inherently mean that anything nefarious happened, but there was a B2B contract written up with the feds, and Jobs accepted it.

The root comment is a perfectly valid question. Since the government wanted to replace the guts with custom Motorola/Intel parts, it's a bit weird that they'd single-out NeXT to sell them an off-the-shelf shell. I'm guessing that Steve's number was in a lot of government Rolodexes after Michael Dell and the others.

reply
Sure, and that would be a reasonable thing to reply to the main comment here, but the actual comment was just muddying the waters and a total non sequitur, as written.
reply
ai bots on hn? naaaaa.....
reply
deleted
reply
deleted
reply